On my quest to find my earliest recorded HAVENITH ancestor, I have come across a few different variants. Most connected to my family, but a couple that I've seen in the same scanned collections as the records I was looking for.
Here are the variants I've found so far, in chronological order:
The earliest record I've been able to find so far is a marriage record from sometime in 1696 for Joannes and Odilia. I say sometime, as it appears to be the only record not given a day and month! It is located between marraiges records on 4 July and record is 4 9bris (November), so is likely to have taken place between those dates. In this record the spelling is HAVENIT.
HAVENIT |
Moving on to 1701 and we have a baptism record for their son, Joannes Hubertus, who later used the name Hubert. This time the surname is spelt: HABENIT.
HABENIT |
HAVENIET |
As family historians we work from the child (the known) backwards to parent and extended family (the unknown): It was from Joannes' baptism record that I found the name of his parents. From searching the scanned collections, there are only 1 Joannes HAVENITH and Anna Elisabetha EMONS that got married, so I feel confident that I have the correct people.
HAVENIET |
Joannes, had a son Joannes Josephus baptised in 1760. We see that the JANSSEN hasn't followed him and that the current spelling of HAVENITH has remained stable.
HAVENITH |
But that stability doesn't remain!
We then have HAVENIETH which starts with Johannes Josephus and continues until 1902 when my GGgrandfather is born with HAVENITH.While HAVENIETH remains stable during these generations in the official records, the people themselves tend to sign their name as HAVENITH. I'm not sure if this is because HAVENIETH was seen as an official or formal spelling, but eventually the modern spelling won out.
HAVENIETH |
HAVENITH |
The following two images show what appear to be variants and in the same area (Liège, Belgium), but do not seem to be related to my ancestors:
HAAFFNIT |
HAFFNIT |
No comments:
Post a Comment